This position paper aims to guide dietitians on appropriate complementary feeding in the healthy term infant.
In this paper, apart from breastmilk or infant formula, ‘complementary food’ refers to solid foods as a nutritional source. Solid foods are needed to complement milk when it is no longer sufficient to meet the energy and nutrient requirements of the growing infant 1. The timing of the introduction of solid foods to an infant’s diet is important for nutritional and developmental reasons 1, 2.
Previously, the UK Department of Health (DH) adopted the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Infant Feeding Recommendation, advising exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life as the best option for most infants. WHO recommended that “to meet their evolving nutritional requirements, infants should receive nutritionally adequate and safe complementary foods whilst breastfeeding continues up to two years of age or beyond” 3.
Advice given to parents and caregivers should be based on accurate information that will help them make informed choices about feeding their infant. Infant feeding choices are influenced by multiple factors, including cultural, socio-economic and lifestyle. Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) must take these factors into account when advising about infant feeding. HCPs consistently report that parents experience difficulties adhering to DH guidelines regarding the appropriate age for the introduction of solid foods.
Surveys conducted in the UK have found that many infants receive solid foods before the age of six months. The Diet and Nutrition Survey of Infants and Young Children (2011) reported that 42% of infants had received solid foods by four months of age. More recently, the Scottish Maternal and Infant Survey (2017) reported that while only 3% of infants began complementary feeding before four months, more than half (54%) had received solid foods before six months of age 4, 5. These surveys suggest that some parents and caregivers perceive their baby as ready for solid foods before six months or provided solid foods for other reasons. HCPs must balance the needs of individuals against population-based recommendations.
In middle- to-high income countries like the UK, there is ongoing debate regarding the applicability of the WHO Global Infant Feeding Recommendations. The evidence supporting the benefits of exclusive breastfeeding until six months compared to four months is not strong. It is acknowledged that parents and caregivers introduce solid foods for various reasons and often follow advice from multiple sources.
In light of this, the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) and the UK Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) reviewed the evidence surrounding the appropriate age for introducing complementary foods to healthy term infants. ESPGHAN found no evidence of harm from introducing solid foods between four and six months of age. However, there was also no evidence of any benefit from introducing solid foods before six months of age 6.
Responsive feeding is needed to support good complementary feeding practices 7. In this type of feeding, parents and caregivers recognise and respond appropriately to infant cues that signal hunger or satiety. This allows the infant to self-regulate how much milk they drink or how much solid food they eat.
The introduction of allergenic foods is another important consideration. Previously, advice has been to delay introducing these foods to children at high risk of food allergy. Recent research suggests that high-risk children may benefit from earlier introduction of peanut-containing foods. The Learning Early About Peanut Allergy (LEAP) study found that the introduction of peanuts at four months, compared with six months of age, decreased the frequency of the development of peanut allergy among children at high risk for this allergy 8.
A substantial body of evidence, including the Eating and Tolerance (EAT) study, found that earlier introduction of potentially allergenic foods was protective against the development of allergy in the general population 9. Based on available evidence, the SACN statement concluded that there was insufficient data to support a recommendation for the introduction of potentially allergenic foods before six months. Since the SACN report more evidence has become available. The Preventing Atopic Dermatitis and Allergies (PreventADALL) study in children found exposure to allergenic foods from three months of age demonstrated reduced food allergy incidence at 36 months in a general population, supporting an early introduction of common allergenic foods as a safe and effective strategy to prevent food allergy 10. The committee recommended the introduction of foods containing peanut and hen’s egg from the start of feeding solids, at around six months of age, alongside other complementary foods 1. Hen’s egg and foods containing egg should be given cooked.
In 2023, the WHO released an updated complementary feeding guideline for infants and young children aged 6−23 months 11. The BDA’s Paediatric Specialist Group committee does support the efforts of the WHO in promoting breastfeeding, protecting against irresponsible marketing of infant formula and highlighting the importance of safe, adequate nutrition for all children worldwide. However, the committee echoes the concerns raised in an international, multi-society response to the WHO 2023 complementary feeding document, published in the Journal of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition earlier this year 12.
The committee would like to further underline that complementary feeding guidelines for infants aged 6-12 months in the UK remain unchanged. Breastfeeding should ideally be continued alongside complementary foods. If breast milk is not available, infant formulas (where available, and where they can be safely prepared) should be used alongside complementary foods 13, 14, 15. The nutritional profile of infant formulas is regulated to optimise their suitability of use and nutritional adequacy for use by infants less than 12 months. Unmodified animal milks are richer in protein. Excessive protein intake in infancy is associated with increased risk of obesity, cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Using unmodified animal milk as the main milk in infancy is also associated with lower intake of vitamin A, vitamin D and iron, leading to nutritional deficiencies such as rickets and iron deficiency anaemia, 12, 16.
The BDA Paediatric Specialist Group makes the following recommendations for the introduction of complementary foods based on the available evidence.
From 12 months, suitable plant-based drinks may be introduced as an alternative to cow’s milk, provided the child is eating a balanced diet and ideally under the guidance of a dietitian. 19, 20.
Families may choose plant-based drinks for a variety of reasons, including ethical, religious, cultural, or environmental preferences, as well as medical needs such as food allergies or intolerances. However, not all plant-based alternatives are nutritionally appropriate. Many lack the full range of nutrients required to support normal growth and development and may increase the risk of nutritional deficiencies in young children.
Whether used occasionally or as the main milk source, any plant-based alternative offered to children over 12 months should meet specific nutritional standards to ensure an adequate intake of essential nutrients.21:
In cases where plant-based milk alternatives are used as the primary milk source after 12 months, tailored guidance should be provided by a dietitian to ensure that the child’s nutritional needs are met through a well-balanced diet. This may include incorporating a variety of nutrient-rich foods and considering nutritional supplements when necessary to support optimal growth and development. The following factors should be evaluated in the child before recommending the transition to plant-based drink as the primary milk alternative22.
This document has been prepared by the committee of the BDA Paediatric Specialist Group, some of whom are autistic. We recognise that language preferences are evolving. We welcome feedback on this document: paediatricgroup@bda.uk.com. The statement is due to be reviewed by May 2027.
With thanks to: Katie Spencer-Chapman, Kiranjit Atwal, Julie Lanigan, Hannah Whittaker, Heather Grant, and Sarah Durnan.
Please accept {{cookieConsents}} cookies to view this content